WEBVTT

1
00:00:01,000 --> 00:00:06,000
My name is Andreas Brenneis. I work at the Institute of Philosophy in Department 2,

2
00:00:06,000 --> 00:00:13,000
History and Social Sciences, primarily in events in teaching methodology.

3
00:00:13,000 --> 00:00:23,000
his means I train future teachers in ethics and philosophy, mainly before they go to internships at a school,

4
00:00:23,000 --> 00:00:33,000
to internships in the subject, they do my courses. "How is teaching structured in non-Corona times?" These events are usually structured as seminars,

5
00:00:33,000 --> 00:00:41,000
so in groups of about twenty people. There is a preparatory seminar, where students work towards the internship. What experiences will we have there?

6
00:00:41,000 --> 00:00:56,000
What would I like to learn? And the second seminar I do is an introductory course in didactics. This has between twenty and thirty people, and is also designed as a seminar.

7
00:00:56,000 --> 00:01:03,000
"How does teaching currently take place in Corona times?" Teaching is still in the form of a seminar, but without us being able to meet on site as a seminar.

8
00:01:03,000 --> 00:01:16,000
I've tried to transform this seminar form in such a way that the essentials remain, but are made accessible via a Moodle course.

9
00:01:16,000 --> 00:01:21,000
The interactions that make up a seminar take place in this Moodle course.

10
00:01:21,000 --> 00:01:27,000
Questions can be asked. What is important for philosophy is the joint reflections, the joint discussion of theses,

11
00:01:27,000 --> 00:01:36,000
and that is what I have tried to bring to the Moodle course from the face-to-face event.

12
00:01:36,000 --> 00:01:41,000
"What were the key challenges in the digital transition?" To find out what possibilities Moodle offers? And what I can depict with

13
00:01:41,000 --> 00:01:49,000
what I actually imagine in my seminar, what else we do,

14
00:01:49,000 --> 00:01:53,000
and above all how to bring in this moment of interaction.

15
00:01:53,000 --> 00:01:59,000
So discussing all this together, considering it together. Finding that you are working together on a problem,

16
00:01:59,000 --> 00:02:10,000
this approaching each other, bringing it into the digital space is quite a challenge.

17
00:02:10,000 --> 00:02:19,000
Overall the course is very well received. The possibility of finding the whole seminar program mapped in this course, arranged by thematic blocks

18
00:02:19,000 --> 00:02:28,000
with tasks that are oriented to the individual topics that build consecutively on each other,

19
00:02:28,000 --> 00:02:37,000
that is something that is already very well received. There are a few formats that are new to students.

20
00:02:37,000 --> 00:02:45,000
I've tried out a lot of what Moodle has to offer, just because I wanted to see it for myself and because I think

21
00:02:45,000 --> 00:02:50,000
there are quite a lot of didactic gains to be made with it.

22
00:02:50,000 --> 00:02:59,000
But when you see a wiki, a glossary for the first time, and perhaps a question-and-answer forum for the first time,

23
00:02:59,000 --> 00:03:08,000
hen there are automatically questions. However, they can also be answered in the seminar. The forum is a good opportunity for this.

24
00:03:08,000 --> 00:03:19,000
And I've also had a consultation with Zoom where questions like these can also be discussed.

25
00:03:19,000 --> 00:03:30,000
"What makes your Moodle course different from others?" When I designed my Moodle course, I was inspired by the courses I have seen with others. Perhaps the first thing to mention

26
00:03:30,000 --> 00:03:35,000
is that for the certificate of university teaching, I attended the basics workshop at the HDA

27
00:03:35,000 --> 00:03:44,000
with Mr. Scheiner and Ms. Brockmann. And they had prepared a very, very comprehensive Moodle course.

28
00:03:44,000 --> 00:03:53,000
So that's what I oriented myself to, and I tried to incorporate the didactic elements of ethics and philosophy there as well. .

29
00:03:53,000 --> 00:03:58,000
And that's why I think that the scope could be one big difference from other courses,

30
00:03:58,000 --> 00:04:06,000
because I've now packed the entire seminar in there, and not just the basic texts that are stored there.

31
00:04:06,000 --> 00:04:12,000
I've worked with task formats before,

32
00:04:12,000 --> 00:04:16,000
so I've organised submissions through the Moodle course. Now I've tried to accommodate everything else that I do in the seminar,

33
00:04:16,000 --> 00:04:22,000
or that we do together in the seminar, in the way of exercises, in interactions, there as well,

34
00:04:22,000 --> 00:04:27,000
so first of all it's the sheer amount. But I've seen lots of other people in Department 2 or in other departments

35
00:04:27,000 --> 00:04:31,000
who have also developed very good Moodle courses in this sense.

36
00:04:31,000 --> 00:04:39,000
The first example is that the students have jointly created a glossary that is to list

37
00:04:39,000 --> 00:04:46,000
the competencies formulated in the core curricula for the subjects of ethics and philosoph

38
00:04:46,000 --> 00:04:57,000
y issued by the Hessian Ministry of Culture. And if someone has entered perceptual competence, for instance from or in the glossary,

39
00:04:57,000 --> 00:05:03,000
then someone else could comment on the fact that the aspects that may be mentioned there are not yet sufficient

40
00:05:03,000 --> 00:05:10,000
or that is connected to the competence of judgement, which is somewhere else.

41
00:05:10,000 --> 00:05:15,000
And so you could build on from what someone else has already written.

42
00:05:15,000 --> 00:05:20,000
And the beauty of it is that person A can do it on Sunday evening if that suits them,

43
00:05:20,000 --> 00:05:32,000
then person B can follow it up on Wednesday morning and add their comments or expand or critique it.

44
00:05:32,000 --> 00:05:40,000
"Were there any problems with the students?" It was indeed resolved quite differently in the glossary. Some did it fabulously, just as I had imagined it, and listed individual terms.

45
00:05:40,000 --> 00:05:52,000
Others took clusters of competencies, didn't just copy them from the core curriculum, but more or less just took them over as they were.

46
00:05:52,000 --> 00:05:58,000
But that is something you can talk about afterwards, and I could also clarify a little what I actually had in mind.

47
00:05:58,000 --> 00:06:04,000
But that is what I learnt with these interactive tasks, or generally from the tasks in Moodle,

48
00:06:04,000 --> 00:06:14,000
it's always good to give an example of what I am expecting. What did work similarly to the glossary was a wiki. In the wiki,

49
00:06:14,000 --> 00:06:24,000
the students compiled materials that they had researched to use them to create lesson designs.

50
00:06:24,000 --> 00:06:30,000
And usually these materials are researched in the ULB. There is a semester apparatus where you can do that.

51
00:06:30,000 --> 00:06:35,000
There are a lot of specialist magazines that you can fall back on.

52
00:06:35,000 --> 00:06:44,000
That didn't work this semester. So instead I provided websites where people can find materials of assured quality.

53
00:06:44,000 --> 00:06:50,000
The students researched this, and then entered it in the wiki.

54
00:06:50,000 --> 00:06:56,000
The wiki has the advantage that you can write the text yourself, but also insert materials.

55
00:06:56,000 --> 00:07:02,000
And it has the tremendous advantage that you can set links to other posts in it.

56
00:07:02,000 --> 00:07:09,000
That is something that I wanted and required, and that was then actually implemented,

57
00:07:09,000 --> 00:07:14,000
links were set between the individual research topics.

58
00:07:14,000 --> 00:07:18,000
Some that are obvious, some that are not.

59
00:07:18,000 --> 00:07:27,000
But it's really nice, of course, when this encourages the students to talk to each other even more rather than the individual working out the material for themselves,

60
00:07:27,000 --> 00:07:31,000
when you see that, OK, that's also related to the topic to the left and right of it.

61
00:07:31,000 --> 00:07:38,000
Another example is the classic feedback, which you can also organise well in Moodle.

62
00:07:38,000 --> 00:07:48,000
For instance, a question-and-answer forum can be used to map where everyone first posts their contribution.

63
00:07:48,000 --> 00:07:58,000
In my case, in the case of the seminar, a lesson plan or a sketch of a lesson plan. That's about two DIN A4 pages to write,

64
00:07:58,000 --> 00:08:06,000
and as soon as it as been entered, you can see the other students' contributions and comment on them.

65
00:08:06,000 --> 00:08:15,000
In my seminar, the task is, once you have posted your own contribution, to comment on two sketches by your fellow students.

66
00:08:15,000 --> 00:08:21,000
There is also always a simulation of a lesson in the seminar.

67
00:08:21,000 --> 00:08:30,000
So it's a preparation for the school internship, and many of the students have already gained intensive experience at the school.

68
00:08:30,000 --> 00:08:35,000
But for some, though, the internship will be the first time that they have walked into a school since leaving it themselves,

69
00:08:35,000 --> 00:08:40,000
only this time in a new role in front of a classroom of students.

70
00:08:40,000 --> 00:08:48,000
And the simulation of a lesson is to build a bit of a bridge to the fact that you have already done this in a safe setting in the seminar.

71
00:08:48,000 --> 00:08:56,000
This means there is usually a 45-minute period in the seminar, and then a second 45- minute period of feedback on what was done.

72
00:08:56,000 --> 00:09:03,000
This simulation is prepared in a small group. Of course, this can't now be done in this form,

73
00:09:03,000 --> 00:09:06,000
and I have given the students the freedom to decide for themselves how to organise it..

74
00:09:06,000 --> 00:09:14,000
The task is still to prepare an ethical-philosophical lesson and somehow to present it in a 45-minute period.

75
00:09:14,000 --> 00:09:22,000
But whether they can do it now in a Zoom meeting with the whole seminar or whether they design a kind of self-learning unit,

76
00:09:22,000 --> 00:09:27,000
which the other students can then do on their computers at home, is up to them.

77
00:09:27,000 --> 00:09:36,000
So the moment of interaction, so to speak, is no longer in my hands, but it is up to the students to decide how they are going to shape it.

78
00:09:36,000 --> 00:09:49,000
"To what extent were you able to implement your didactic principles as planned?" I can't really make a final decision about that yet. But I enjoyed designing this course. I think the students also enjoy doing it. Of course, there is also communication away from the course.

79
00:09:49,000 --> 00:09:56,000
I'd like to channel it all through the forum,

80
00:09:56,000 --> 00:10:03,000
ut I know there are friends in there, or acquaintances, who chat together in WhatsApp, and that's perfectly all right as well.

81
00:10:03,000 --> 00:10:10,000
And I also want questions to be discussed in the course forum rather than being emailed to me.

82
00:10:10,000 --> 00:10:16,000
This is done eighty, ninety percent of the time, but occasionally a question is emailed to me personally..

83
00:10:16,000 --> 00:10:24,000
But implementing the didactic principles is difficult,,

84
00:10:24,000 --> 00:10:30,000
on the one hand because because it is probably also accepted differently,

85
00:10:30,000 --> 00:10:36,000
as the students all have different personalities. Some will find it very easy to sit alone at their computer,

86
00:10:36,000 --> 00:10:43,000
do these tasks and have these occasional meetings or interactions.

87
00:10:43,000 --> 00:10:50,000
Others will miss seeing the other students in a seminar. And that's what I miss, too.

88
00:10:50,000 --> 00:10:56,000
I think the quality of the entries and submissions so far has been extraordinarily good.

89
00:10:56,000 --> 00:11:03,000
Even if I compare it with what I usually experience in a seminar discussion, I am pleasantly surprised.

90
00:11:03,000 --> 00:11:11,000
But what I can't judge from a distance is how well someone is actually thinking along or whatever.

91
00:11:11,000 --> 00:11:18,000
That's something I miss. So a little of this personal contact that is simply easier to see when you are in a room together,

92
00:11:18,000 --> 00:11:25,000
is usually probably something that distinguishes a seminar from self-study.

93
00:11:25,000 --> 00:11:29,000
So the texts that I provide are ones that anyone can read for themselves,

94
00:11:29,000 --> 00:11:33,000
but somehow talking about them,

95
00:11:33,000 --> 00:11:39,000
and perhaps understanding someone else's point if they are criticising something, and then reflecting on it yourself again, that's something

96
00:11:39,000 --> 00:11:47,000
that is more difficult to do in the forum and the Moodle course even if there is a lot of communication.

97
00:11:47,000 --> 00:11:51,000
"Did you deliberately build in activating moments?" Well, I would say that the activating moments are in the assignments.

98
00:11:51,000 --> 00:11:58,000
There are extensive tasks involved, such as writing a lesson plan yourself and the others rating it.

99
00:11:58,000 --> 00:12:02,000
But there are also smaller tasks where you just have to vote on a scale of "one" to "ten".

100
00:12:02,000 --> 00:12:09,000
Whether or not a best-practice example really is a best-practice example.

101
00:12:09,000 --> 00:12:14,000
UAnd that always comes with submission deadlines. Well, I've created an overview page

102
00:12:14,000 --> 00:12:21,000
with all the tasks on in, and where there is a grouping by internal logic,

103
00:12:21,000 --> 00:12:32,000
in other words, which task logically follows on from which other task?  And grouping by the chronological sequence of the submission dates.

104
00:12:32,000 --> 00:12:44,000
And I've tried to set these submission deadlines so that the students are drawn back into the course every two weeks at the latest to see what's going on.

105
00:12:44,000 --> 00:12:57,000
"What activities did you use within Moodle to implement your concept?" I have a student on my course who also tutors in pedagogy, and she started using the question-and-answer forum for her tutorials right away.

106
00:12:57,000 --> 00:13:06,000
It really is great, as I learnt from the HDA on the course, that this student is taking it further.

107
00:13:06,000 --> 00:13:11,000
Absolutely, I said quite classic earlier on. So far I've always worked with tasks,

108
00:13:11,000 --> 00:13:19,000
so either when something is submitted directly via Moodle, or where you create a PDF and then just upload it.

109
00:13:19,000 --> 00:13:27,000
This is still the framework that I use to evaluate the students' individual performance.

110
00:13:27,000 --> 00:13:34,000
Well, these are personal submissions, everyone is responsible for what they enter.

111
00:13:34,000 --> 00:13:46,000
Then I used the glossary. Next time I'd give a better example of what I imagine it to be.

112
00:13:46,000 --> 00:13:58,000
But in principle, I think it is probably also highly suitable for a humanities subject, but equally for social science and natural science subjects.

113
00:13:58,000 --> 00:14:03,000
Then the wiki, which has the tremendous advantage that you can set this link together with the others.

114
00:14:03,000 --> 00:14:09,000
With regard to the wiki, the students told me that it is actually anything but self-explanatory

115
00:14:09,000 --> 00:14:17,000
when it comes to creating subpages, creating links, that sort of thing.

116
00:14:17,000 --> 00:14:23,000
But once you understand it, I think it is a very, very comprehensive tool

117
00:14:23,000 --> 00:14:27,000
that is very good to use. And I think it is also fun at the end of the course

118
00:14:27,000 --> 00:14:31,000
to look at what I have built up myself here on this subject with my course.

119
00:14:31,000 --> 00:14:41,000
I've used surveys, once just to rate something,

120
00:14:41,000 --> 00:14:47,000
the best-practice example I just mentioned, once to say, OK, on a scale of "one" to "ten", then you can also see how the others rated it.

121
00:14:47,000 --> 00:14:52,000
"I've said that I think it's pretty lousy. The others really like it."

122
00:14:52,000 --> 00:15:01,000
Why should that be? And that's rather activating in the sense that a brief text is then to be written about it.

123
00:15:01,000 --> 00:15:08,000
So you validate, as it were, the mark you gave it in a short text. I use forums.

124
00:15:08,000 --> 00:15:13,000
With pleasure, the question-and-answer forum, which I hadn't used before.

125
00:15:13,000 --> 00:15:23,000
This allows the students to create a post before they can see each others' contributions.

126
00:15:23,000 --> 00:15:34,000
This is how we do it for feedback stories, so it's highly suited. I've set a link to Padlet, to an external website. I did first think about whether I should do it.

127
00:15:34,000 --> 00:15:47,000
But then I decided to go ahead with it, because Padlet is a kind of mind-mapping tool where you can create index cards

128
00:15:47,000 --> 00:15:55,000
and then move them around on this map. A chat function is included where you can discuss things, the students can discuss among themselves,

129
00:15:55,000 --> 00:16:01,000
"Why did you move that to the left rather than to the right?". And there's a rating system,

130
00:16:01,000 --> 00:16:07,000
so you can give it a "thumbs up" or a "thumbs down", and that strikes me as quite interesting.

131
00:16:07,000 --> 00:16:14,000
Well, I don't know myself yet how it is actually used, but yes, I thought it would be nice to have something graphic with it.

132
00:16:14,000 --> 00:16:25,000
I used the "Requested" activity. There is a total of six thematic blocks, one of which is a bit like an excursion.

133
00:16:25,000 --> 00:16:32,000
You don't necessarily have to deal with it, or there are no further tasks that build on from this course.

134
00:16:32,000 --> 00:16:39,000
But the "Requested" activity opens up a conversation about what parts of these texts are going to be discussed again,

135
00:16:39,000 --> 00:16:47,000
easy to understand, what is perhaps worthy of criticism, what one might want to understand better.

136
00:16:47,000 --> 00:16:58,000
And I used tools for the simulation of lessons, the group formation and the scheduler.

137
00:16:58,000 --> 00:17:06,000
Just bring a bit of structure into it in order to be able to set deadlines by when these groups should be there.

138
00:17:06,000 --> 00:17:12,000
So at some point you enter into an exchange with the others

139
00:17:12,000 --> 00:17:19,000
and can say, "Right, and with regard to this subject and that, I can imagine that such-and-such would be able to work well with so-and-so."

140
00:17:19,000 --> 00:17:26,000
Well, the exchange at the Institute with the other scientific staff here really helps me to know how they are doing this,

141
00:17:26,000 --> 00:17:31,000
but beyond that and perhaps even more to understand

142
00:17:31,000 --> 00:17:41,000
the working methods of entirely different departments. And the HDA further training, additional training really helped me.

143
00:17:41,000 --> 00:17:47,000
Well, my Moodle course in particular is very close to, closely based on a course that I learnt about there.

144
00:17:47,000 --> 00:17:53,000
I would say that benefited me the most. It is extensive.

145
00:17:53,000 --> 00:17:58,000
But you don't have to learn everything. And the websites,

146
00:17:58,000 --> 00:18:05,000
I often go to the HDA website to see what they recommend

147
00:18:05,000 --> 00:18:16,000
for an activating measure in a Moodle course, for instance. And there's also a very good database there that you can use.

148
00:18:16,000 --> 00:18:24,000
"What is your opinion on asynchronous teaching?" I think it's a good way for anyone to address the topic at the time that suits them.

149
00:18:24,000 --> 00:18:28,000
And now especially, during this corona crisis, people are able to do things at vastly different times.

150
00:18:28,000 --> 00:18:38,000
One of my students has three children. She can't make the Thursday afternoon Zoom meeting on a regular basis.

151
00:18:38,000 --> 00:18:46,000
It's impossible for her. And in that respect, it also helps me as a teacher,

152
00:18:46,000 --> 00:18:52,000
it's a challenge to keep an eye on who is perhaps being left behind.

153
00:18:52,000 --> 00:18:59,000
Well, it's not my job to keep everyone on the ball,

154
00:18:59,000 --> 00:19:09,000
but it's what I want to do. And that's an additional challenge that comes with this asynchronous learning.

155
00:19:09,000 --> 00:19:19,000
"Do you have a larger communication effort?" es, there is a lot more communicating. But at the moment, this seminar session, the one I would normally have every Thursday or that I would have every week,

156
00:19:19,000 --> 00:19:26,000
is no longer happening. I think it's actually very nice to be able to communicate via the forum,

157
00:19:26,000 --> 00:19:32,000
because the matter then has a certain level of commitment for both sides.

158
00:19:32,000 --> 00:19:34,000
Well, I have to think very carefully about what I'm going to write in there.

159
00:19:34,000 --> 00:19:40,000
But it goes with what I mentioned earlier, the students' tasks, even smaller ones

160
00:19:40,000 --> 00:19:47,000
involving perhaps half a page of writing, generally the quality has improved, I would say.

161
00:19:47,000 --> 00:19:51,000
And that's because it's written down somewhere,

162
00:19:51,000 --> 00:20:02,000
and perhaps also because the others can see it directly, so there are pros and cons.

163
00:20:02,000 --> 00:20:12,000
"Is there anything you'd like to say in closing?" For a long time now, the Institute of Philosophy has been making sure that teaching materials are available online,

164
00:20:12,000 --> 00:20:19,000
and in this specific semester has lecture recordings at its disposal that have been saved in Open Learn

165
00:20:19,000 --> 00:20:23,000
and that is, of course, a finding that also has its benefits.

166
00:20:23,000 --> 00:20:28,000
It's also great if this actual interaction in the seminars doesn't necessarily mean

167
00:20:28,000 --> 00:20:33,000
that you have lecture recordings up your sleeve that you can then conjure out of a hat.

168
00:20:33,000 --> 00:20:46,122
But as it happens, they are always available, but in the current situation are very good at maintaining teaching operations.

